The Double-Cross

Impact of Corporate America and the Liberal Establishment on American Women

In 1960, Corporate America foresaw a growing global demand for American intellectual properties, manufactured products, natural resources, and agricultural commodities. To meet this demand, they sought to tap into a sizable pool of women who were homemakers and mothers. However, there were significant obstacles:

1. The inherent love of women for motherhood, ingrained in their nature since time immemorial.
2. The fulfillment women found in being homemakers, which resonated with their innate disposition.

To overcome these obstacles and entice women to leave their homes, corporations employed several strategies:

1. Cultivating a strong desire for material goods and entertainment, necessitating higher family incomes.
2. Promoting no-fault divorce, making it easier for women to separate from their husbands.
3. Creating societal pressure for women to join the workforce.
4. Normalizing recreational sex and making birth control readily available and socially acceptable.
5. Making abortion legal, accessible, inexpensive, and culturally appropriate.

These initiatives received substantial financial and social support from the Democratic Party, Corporate America, and the Liberal Establishment. They claimed that restricting access to abortion went against American values, hindered business interests, and threatened employees’ health, independence and economic stability. Additionally, they argued that it impeded businesses’ ability to build diverse and inclusive workforces, recruit top talent and protect the well-being of their employees.

Furthermore, the educational system became a propaganda arm to promote Corporate America’s agenda, with influential figures such as Melinda Gates, George Soros, and Warren Buffet donating significant sums to push women toward abortion, away from the home, and into the workplace.

The consequences of these strategies are profound:

1. The destruction of the femininity of American women.
2. Doubled divorce rates, with 70% initiated by women.
3. Soaring suicide rates.
4. Unprecedented levels of drug and alcohol abuse.
5. Epidemic levels of sexually transmitted diseases among women.
6. Widespread prevalence of depression and anxiety.
7. A decline in the U.S. fertility rate from 3.5 in 1950 to 1.6 in 2022.
8. Transformation of women to adopt more masculine traits, including a need to dominate competitiveness, and an “alpha” mindset.

While opportunities for women have expanded, they have come at enormous costs. Data suggests an absolute decline in female happiness in the United States, with an even larger decline relative to men. The decline in female happiness is widespread and cannot be attributed to a single social phenomenon. Modern women face challenges in finding lasting love, and men have been the primary beneficiaries of the women’s movement.

By age 15, approximately half of all U.S. children are no longer living with both biological parents. Female misogyny is more prevalent today, with toxic behaviors observed as women protect their positions against other women. The pursuit of careers and material success has not brought the expected happiness, but rather a steady decline since the early 1970s.

“For my entire life, women have been told that pregnancy is a barrier to a successful career. This lie has led to millions of abortions, despite women like me and countless others proving that successful careers and motherhood are not mutually exclusive. I was born a little over a year before the U.S. Supreme Court decided that abortion is necessary for women to succeed. I was eight months pregnant when I first took over our family ranch following my father’s tragic death. Today, as a former state legislator, congresswoman, and South Dakota’s first female governor, I stand in defiance of the lies perpetrated by the Roe decision.”

Governor Kristi Noem

It is crucial to acknowledge the multifaceted nature of this issue and the diverse perspectives surrounding it. Sources cited include Suzanne Venker, Erika Bachiochi, and Betsey Stevenson’s work on the paradox of declining female happiness. Additionally, statistics from reputable sources such as Guttmacher Institute, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and statements from Nancy Pelosi and the U.S. chamber of Commerce are referenced.

Note: This text presents various viewpoints and arguments, but does not necessarily endorse or validate all the claims made.

David Cortens, June 2023